From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932506AbWHCODu (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:03:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932501AbWHCODu (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:03:50 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.21]:48869 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932496AbWHCODt (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:03:49 -0400 X-Authenticated: #428038 Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:03:44 +0200 From: Matthias Andree To: Hans Reiser Cc: ric@emc.com, Edward Shishkin , Alan Cox , Adrian Ulrich , "Horst H. von Brand" , bernd-schubert@gmx.de, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, jbglaw@lug-owl.de, clay.barnes@gmail.com, rudy@edsons.demon.nl, ipso@snappymail.ca, lkml@lpbproductions.com, jeff@garzik.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion Message-ID: <20060803140344.GC7431@merlin.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: Hans Reiser , ric@emc.com, Edward Shishkin , Alan Cox , Adrian Ulrich , "Horst H. von Brand" , bernd-schubert@gmx.de, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, jbglaw@lug-owl.de, clay.barnes@gmail.com, rudy@edsons.demon.nl, ipso@snappymail.ca, lkml@lpbproductions.com, jeff@garzik.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200607312314.37863.bernd-schubert@gmx.de> <200608011428.k71ESIuv007094@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> <20060801165234.9448cb6f.reiser4@blinkenlights.ch> <1154446189.15540.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44CF9BAD.5020003@emc.com> <44CF3DE0.3010501@namesys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44CF3DE0.3010501@namesys.com> X-PGP-Key: http://home.pages.de/~mandree/keys/GPGKEY.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12 (2006-07-17) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 01 Aug 2006, Hans Reiser wrote: > You will want to try our compression plugin, it has an ecc for every 64k.... What kind of forward error correction would that be, and how much and what failure patterns can it correct? URL suffices. -- Matthias Andree