From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751122AbWHGV6E (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:58:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751133AbWHGV6E (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:58:04 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:12050 "EHLO spitz.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751122AbWHGV6C (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:58:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:56:02 +0000 From: Pavel Machek To: Hans Reiser Cc: Jeff Garzik , David Masover , Linus Torvalds , "Horst H. von Brand" , Andrew Morton , Theodore Tso , LKML , ReiserFS List Subject: ext3 vs reiserfs speed (was Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)) Message-ID: <20060807215602.GA4540@ucw.cz> References: <200607281402.k6SE245v004715@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> <44CA31D2.70203@slaphack.com> <44C9FB93.9040201@namesys.com> <44CA6905.4050002@slaphack.com> <44CA126C.7050403@namesys.com> <44CA98F9.1040900@garzik.org> <44CAD3FF.8060203@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44CAD3FF.8060203@namesys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > Using guilt as an argument in a technical discussion is a flashing red > > sign that says "I have no technical rebuttal" > > Wow, that is really nervy. Let's recap this all: > > * reiser4 has a 2x performance advantage over the next fastest FS > (ext3), and when compression ships in a month that will double again as > well as save space. See http://www.namesys.com/benchmarks.html, and Does that mean that ext3 is faster than reiser3? Wow, that would be good reason to switch default filesystem to ext3 (or reiser4?) in next suse release. Pavel -- Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.