From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161069AbXAELxH (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 06:53:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161074AbXAELxH (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 06:53:07 -0500 Received: from www.sf-tec.de ([62.27.20.187]:36679 "EHLO mail.sf-mail.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161069AbXAELxG (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 06:53:06 -0500 From: Rolf Eike Beer To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc3] TTY_IO: Remove unnecessary kmalloc casts Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:54:21 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20070105063600.GA13571@Ahmed> <200701051126.13682.eike-kernel@sf-tec.de> <20070105103247.GC382@Ahmed> In-Reply-To: <20070105103247.GC382@Ahmed> Cc: "Ahmed S. Darwish" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2211652.RijxarK1Ia"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701051254.21618.eike-kernel@sf-tec.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nextPart2211652.RijxarK1Ia Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Freitag, 5. Januar 2007 11:32 schrieb Ahmed S. Darwish: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 11:26:07AM +0100, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > > One big patch for the whole kernel will not work anyway. You have to > > split it up to allow subsystems to integrate them in their own trees. > > With one big patch you would get collisions all over the tree causing t= he > > complete patch to get dropped. Also CC subsystem maintainers on their > > parts. And please send the patches as replies to the first one as it > > cleans up readability of lkml a lot :) > > Oops, Just read this warning after sending the (big) patch. Sorry It's my > first patch :). I'll split it and do as written. Thanks alot :). That wasn't meant for resending. If you resend the whole series it's good t= o=20 start a new thread. But if you have several related patches (usually this=20 [PATCH N/xx] thing) it helps if you either send a 0/xx first describing the= =20 whole series or at least sending everything as reply to 1/xx. This way the= =20 mail program will help everybody by keeping this things together. Eike --nextPart2211652.RijxarK1Ia Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFnjxtXKSJPmm5/E4RAtCtAJ9ICcRg63B0UEVsxk5iO2vH5O5//ACdGaVz bZItGzyHVJvhbjz4CLrJESE= =bp8e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2211652.RijxarK1Ia--