From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1161191AbXAHIIF@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1161191AbXAHIIF (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 8 Jan 2007 03:08:05 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161188AbXAHIIF
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 8 Jan 2007 03:08:05 -0500
Received: from aun.it.uu.se ([130.238.12.36]:51312 "EHLO aun.it.uu.se"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1161189AbXAHIIE (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 8 Jan 2007 03:08:04 -0500
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:07:56 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <200701080807.l0887umA001294@harpo.it.uu.se>
From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
To: jeff@garzik.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH libata #promise-sata-pata] sata_promise: unbreak 20619
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:46:13 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Given that I agree with your RFC, this means I can drop all these 
> #promise-sata-pata patches, and kill the #promise-sata-pata branch soon, 
> right?

Yes

/Mikael