From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933219AbXBBEZw (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 23:25:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933232AbXBBEZw (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 23:25:52 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:60164 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933219AbXBBEZv (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 23:25:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 20:22:13 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: jbohac@suse.cz Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vojtech Pavlik , ssouhlal@freebsd.org, arjan@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, johnstul@us.ibm.com, zippel@linux-m68k.org, andrea@suse.de Subject: Re: [patch 0/9] x86_64: reliable TSC-based gettimeofday Message-Id: <20070201202213.c7726d68.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070201095952.589234000@jet.suse.cz> References: <20070201095952.589234000@jet.suse.cz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:59:52 +0100 jbohac@suse.cz wrote: > TSC-based x86_64 timekeeping implementation I worry about the relationship between this work and all the time-management changes in -mm. If Andi to were to merge all this stuff under that then I expect various catastrophes would ensue. Have you checked to determine the severity of the overlaps?