From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Vassili Karpov" <av1474@comtv.ru>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CPU load
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:08:14 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702121708.14915.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070212165554.42d12419.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Monday 12 February 2007 16:55, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:44:22 +1100 "Con Kolivas" <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> > The kernel looks at what is using cpu _only_ during the timer
> > interrupt. Which means if your HZ is 1000 it looks at what is running
> > at precisely the moment those 1000 timer ticks occur. It is
> > theoretically possible using this measurement system to use >99% cpu
> > and record 0 usage if you time your cpu usage properly. It gets even
> > more inaccurate at lower HZ values for the same reason.
>
> That is not true on all architecures, some do more accurate accounting by
> recording the times at user/kernel/interrupt transitions ...
Indeed. It's certainly the way the common more boring pc architectures do it
though.
--
-ck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-12 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-12 5:33 CPU load Vassili Karpov
2007-02-12 5:44 ` Con Kolivas
2007-02-12 5:54 ` malc
2007-02-12 6:12 ` Con Kolivas
2007-02-12 7:10 ` malc
2007-02-12 7:29 ` Con Kolivas
2007-02-12 5:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2007-02-12 6:08 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2007-02-12 14:32 ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-13 22:01 ` malc
2007-02-13 22:08 ` Con Kolivas
2007-02-14 7:28 ` malc
2007-02-14 8:09 ` Con Kolivas
2007-02-14 20:45 ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-25 10:35 ` malc
2007-02-26 9:28 ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-26 10:42 ` malc
2007-02-26 16:38 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-02-12 18:05 ` malc
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-02-12 16:57 Andrew Burgess
2007-02-12 18:15 ` malc
2002-07-10 14:50 David Chow
2002-07-10 16:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-10 17:49 ` Robert Love
2002-07-26 17:38 ` David Chow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200702121708.14915.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=av1474@comtv.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).