From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030194AbXBLW0t (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:26:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030208AbXBLW0s (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:26:48 -0500 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:60274 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030194AbXBLW0r (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:26:47 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Chuck Ebbert Subject: Re: [PATCH x86 for review III] [12/29] x86_64: 32-bit ptrace mangles sixth system call argument Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:26:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Jeff Dike , patches@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20070212551.664370000@suse.de> <20070212165132.6518713F45@wotan.suse.de> <45D0E486.9020104@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <45D0E486.9020104@redhat.com> Organization: - MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702122326.23406.andi@firstfloor.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Didn't we have problems with this exact approach before? This one was dropped > because it caused 32-bit programs to crash: > http://www2.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.13/2.6.13-mm2/broken-out/x86-64-ptrace-ia32-bp-fix.patch > > See: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/09/16/261 > > for the one I proposed instead. Yes you're right. I dropped it for now. -Andi