From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751497AbXBPOyZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:54:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751460AbXBPOyY (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:54:24 -0500 Received: from yumi.tdiedrich.de ([85.10.210.183]:4070 "EHLO yumi.tdiedrich.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751388AbXBPOyX (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:54:23 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:54:17 +0100 From: Tobias Diedrich To: Jeff Garzik , Ayaz Abdulla , David Ford , Andrew Morton , Robert Hancock , linux-kernel , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 Message-ID: <20070216145417.GC5388@melchior.yamamaya.is-a-geek.org> Mail-Followup-To: Tobias Diedrich , Jeff Garzik , Ayaz Abdulla , David Ford , Andrew Morton , Robert Hancock , linux-kernel , netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <45C6BCE5.90103@shaw.ca> <20070204213603.a5bce839.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <45C6C531.20508@shaw.ca> <20070204221741.63152cbe.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <523e55a00702081326j43de05e3hdd8cf35e946eae9@mail.gmail.com> <45CBE30D.5030006@nvidia.com> <20070209115821.GD10330@melchior.yamamaya.is-a-geek.org> <20070209120730.GA11911@melchior.yamamaya.is-a-geek.org> <45CC8A2D.20509@garzik.org> <20070212062823.GB4756@melchior.yamamaya.is-a-geek.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20070212062823.GB4756@melchior.yamamaya.is-a-geek.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tobias Diedrich wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Tobias Diedrich wrote: > > >Tobias Diedrich wrote: > > >>Ayaz Abdulla wrote: > > >>>For all those who are having issues, please try out the attached patch. > > >>Will try. > > > > > >Does not apply cleanly against 2.6.20, is this one fixed up right? > > > > It probably needs to be top of 2.6.20-git-latest or 2.6.20-rc6-mm3. > > > > IOW, the forcedeth changes in question are not in 2.6.20, and you need > > to apply the patch on top of the latest batch of forcedeth changes. > > Well, it hasn't blown up on me despite being applied to 2.6.20... > The problem I was seeing might even be fixed in 2.6.20 vanilla, > since the last version I saw it in was 2.6.20-rc6 and then I > reverted to 2.6.19 to make sure that one is ok (see > 20070130183208.GE11814@melchior.yamamaya.is-a-geek.org). And having run vanilla 2.6.20 since my last mail, I haven't seen the problem on that one either. So I _guess_ the particular problem I was seeing was fixed somewhere between 2.6.20-rc6 and 2.6.20. But since I can't reliably trigger it, I can't say that for sure. -- Tobias PGP: http://9ac7e0bc.uguu.de このメールは十割再利用されたビットで作られています。