From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752388AbXCANhP (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:37:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752397AbXCANhP (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:37:15 -0500 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.144]:57998 "EHLO e4.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752388AbXCANhN (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:37:13 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:05:43 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: menage@google.com Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, sam@vilain.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org, pj@sgi.com, dev@sw.ru, xemul@sw.ru, serue@us.ibm.com, containers@lists.osdl.org, winget@google.com, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy! Message-ID: <20070301133543.GK15509@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa@in.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul, Based on some of the feedback to container patches, I have respun them to avoid the "container" structure abstraction and instead use nsproxy structure in the kernel. User interface (which I felt was neat in your patches) has been retained to be same. What follows is the core (big) patch and the cpu_acct subsystem to serve as an example of how to use it. I suspect we can make cpusets also work on top of this very easily. Oh and since most of the code is serving the purpose of being a filesystem, I have renamed the patch to be a resource control file system - rcfs! -- Regards, vatsa