From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932817AbXCDPZJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:25:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932873AbXCDPZJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:25:09 -0500 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:49488 "EHLO mailhub.stusta.mhn.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932817AbXCDPZI (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:25:08 -0500 Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:25:06 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: David Howells Cc: Andrew Morton , Maciej Rutecki , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1] #error no ROMFS backing store interface configured Message-ID: <20070304152506.GC3441@stusta.de> References: <20070304041111.1d2774e7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070302030026.5eef0c92.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070302030405.22f78999.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <45EAB46F.1030709@gmail.com> <14778.1173021069@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <14778.1173021069@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 03:11:09PM +0000, David Howells wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > So we require that one of these be enabled if ROMFS. > > At least one, yes. Both can be enabled. I don't know how to do it though. How to solve it depends on the intended semantics. Is CONFIG_BLOCK=y CONFIG_ROMFS_FS=y CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_BLOCK=n CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_MTD=y a reasonable configuration that should be supported, or can we turn CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_BLOCK always on if CONFIG_BLOCK=y? > David cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed