From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933100AbXCETbY (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:31:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933157AbXCETbY (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:31:24 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:52717 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933100AbXCETbX (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:31:23 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:30:25 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Daniel Walker Cc: Andrew Morton , Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Michal Piotrowski , Thomas Gleixner , Emil Karlson , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Soeren Sonnenburg Subject: Re: [5/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions Message-ID: <20070305193025.GB26065@elte.hu> References: <20070305015040.GJ3441@stusta.de> <20070305075747.GA19838@elte.hu> <20070305001358.2eebbfae.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1173108303.31337.18.camel@imap.mvista.com> <20070305152749.GA22258@elte.hu> <1173112936.31337.26.camel@imap.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1173112936.31337.26.camel@imap.mvista.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Daniel Walker wrote: > I used this simple test case given by you a long time ago, > > main () > { > iopl(3); > for (;;) > asm("cli"); > > } > > This doesn't look like a regression tho, 2.6.19-rc6 has the same > behavior .. hm, so this doesnt get detected as a lockup at all? That's bad and needs fixing ... Ingo