From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933080AbXCHTKu (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:10:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933079AbXCHTKu (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:10:50 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:35616 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933058AbXCHTKs (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:10:48 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 20:06:42 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jens Axboe , Jeff Chua , pavel@suse.cz, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, luming.yu@intel.com, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz , Konstantin Karasyov , Greg KH , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Thomas Meyer , Meelis Roos , Alexey Starikovskiy , Janosch Machowinski , vladimir.p.lebedev@intel.com, Ash Milsted , dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions Message-ID: <20070308190642.GA30517@elte.hu> References: <20070305015034.GG3441@stusta.de> <20070308123143.GF5149@mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Linus Torvalds wrote: > > 3. When I switch to X (CTRL-ALT-F7), X hangs after drawing a couple of windows > > after waiting for some 10 min, I rebooted. no new messages showed > > up in /var/log/messages > > I think this is likely just more of the disk being buggered, but it > could again be related to NO_HZ (people report time not advancing, and > that would make any X timeout taking forever, and you'd see exactly > your behaviour). Michael - does your 'date' output advance after resume? If not then i'd say it's a NO_HZ related problem. If yes then i'd guess it's the SATA problem. Ingo