From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752628AbXCHUNt (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:13:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752640AbXCHUNs (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:13:48 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:46501 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752628AbXCHUNq (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:13:46 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:10:19 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Linus Torvalds , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jens Axboe , Jeff Chua , pavel@suse.cz, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, luming.yu@intel.com, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz , Konstantin Karasyov , Greg KH , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Thomas Meyer , Meelis Roos , Alexey Starikovskiy , Janosch Machowinski , vladimir.p.lebedev@intel.com, Ash Milsted , dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions Message-ID: <20070308201019.GA10782@elte.hu> References: <20070305015034.GG3441@stusta.de> <20070308123143.GF5149@mellanox.co.il> <20070308190642.GA30517@elte.hu> <20070308194723.GF17114@mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070308194723.GF17114@mellanox.co.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Michael - does your 'date' output advance after resume? If not then > > i'd say it's a NO_HZ related problem. If yes then i'd guess it's the > > SATA problem. > > I'll test, but I have NO_HZ off for now. there can still be effects of it (the regression we fixed in -rc3 was such an effect too), so please test it. Ingo