linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Marc St-Jean <Marc_St-Jean@pmc-sierra.com>
Cc: stjeanma@pmc-sierra.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: PMC MSP71xx LED driver
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 22:13:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070309221348.c5ab7acc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45F1DDC8.1010503@pmc-sierra.com>

> On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:20:56 -0800  Marc St-Jean <Marc_St-Jean@pmc-sierra.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> >  > +typedef enum {
> >  > +     MSP_LED_INPUT = 0,
> >  > +     MSP_LED_OUTPUT,
> >  > +} msp_led_direction_t;
> > 
> > No typedefs, please.   Convert this to
> > 
> > enum msp_led_direction {
> >         ...
> > };
> 
> Alright I'll change it but it wasn't mentioned in the review of
> the previous drivers and they've been resubmitted with some.
> A quick search shows several drivers typedef'ing enums with and
> without *_t suffixes.

Poeple do bad things, and it sometimes gets missed.

> Is there a new style rule or are only core kernel types allowed to
> use _t?

The general rule is: no typedefs.

typedefs make sense when the underlying type can change: u64, size_t,
resource_size_t, etc.  We also use them for really hairy definitions like
filler_t.  Nothing else.  Please don't use them just to save typing.

> 
> >  > +/* Output modes */
> >  > +typedef enum {
> >  > +     MSP_LED_OFF = 0,                /* Off steady */
> >  > +     MSP_LED_ON,                             /* On steady */
> >  > +     MSP_LED_BLINK,                  /* On for initialPeriod, off 
> > for finalPeriod */
> >  > +     MSP_LED_BLINK_INVERT,   /* Off for initialPeriod, on for 
> > finalPeriod */
> >  > +} msp_led_mode_t;
> > 
> > Ditto.
> > 
> >  > +/* For non-LED pins, these macros set HI and LO accordingly */
> >  > +#define msp_led_pin_hi       msp_led_turn_off
> >  > +#define msp_led_pin_lo       msp_led_turn_on
> > 
> > eww.
> > 
> > static inline wrapper functions are preferred.  Write code in C, not cpp
> > where possible.
> 
> I agree the wrappers are cleaner but don't understand how this relates
> to C++.

cpp == C preprocessor.

It would be better to do

/*
 * nice comment goes here 
 */
static inline void msp_led_pin_hi(...)
{
	msp_led_turn_off(...);
}


  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-10  6:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-09 22:20 [PATCH] drivers: PMC MSP71xx LED driver Marc St-Jean
2007-03-10  6:13 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-13 17:42 Marc St-Jean
2007-03-12 18:50 Marc St-Jean
2007-03-13  8:33 ` Florian Fainelli
2007-02-26 23:48 Marc St-Jean
2007-03-05 10:17 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070309221348.c5ab7acc.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=Marc_St-Jean@pmc-sierra.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=stjeanma@pmc-sierra.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).