From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751243AbXCJWIa (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Mar 2007 17:08:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751240AbXCJWIa (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Mar 2007 17:08:30 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:51118 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751205AbXCJWI2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Mar 2007 17:08:28 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:08:10 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Stefan Seyfried , Johannes Stezenbach , Linus Torvalds , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jens Axboe , Jeff Chua , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, luming.yu@intel.com, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz , Konstantin Karasyov , Greg KH , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Thomas Meyer , Meelis Roos , Alexey Starikovskiy , Janosch Machowinski , vladimir.p.lebedev@intel.com, Ash Milsted , dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com Subject: Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions Message-ID: <20070310220810.GF2758@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20070308123143.GF5149@mellanox.co.il> <20070308192554.GA2999@elte.hu> <20070308230705.GA4611@elte.hu> <20070309174821.GA31754@linuxtv.org> <20070309233508.GB2197@elf.ucw.cz> <20070310090121.GB15647@elte.hu> <20070310114301.GA30554@suse.de> <20070310151804.GA10627@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070310151804.GA10627@elte.hu> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > Ok. To be honest, you are the first reporter that seems to have read > > the documentation above, but not understood what to do. > > thanks for the compliment ;-) _I_ very much know what to do (i mailed > the right person after all ;), but i dont really count and on the 6 (Can we get the whitelist entries?) > > i might consider reworking the documentation if there are more reports > > about problems with the procedure. > > Probably tweaking the webpage doesnt help because people dont get there > - as the results plainly show it. Maybe some more automation would be > useful too, a tool that detects failed resume and tries all those > options that makes sense on that box or something? It's not like > that Unfortunately, these tend to crash the box when you pass wrong options, and I do not see easy way to test "can user see whats on display" automatically. Feel free to send patches, but I do not think it is easy/possible. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html