From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752795AbXCMI2Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2007 04:28:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753177AbXCMI2Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2007 04:28:24 -0400 Received: from vms048pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.48]:64887 "EHLO vms048pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752795AbXCMI2X (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2007 04:28:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 04:28:10 -0400 From: Gene Heskett Subject: New thread RDSL, post-2.6.20 kernels and amanda (tar) miss-fires To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <200703130428.11014.gene.heskett@gmail.com> Organization: Organization? very little MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greetings; Someone suggested a fresh thread for this. I now have my scripts more or less under control, and I can report that kernel-2.6.20.1 with no other patches does not exhibit the undesirable behaviour where tar thinks its all new, even when told to do a level 2 on a directory tree that hasn't been touched in months to update anything. Next up, 2.6.20.2, plain and with the latest RDSL-0.30 patch. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) > Alan Cox wrote: [..] No I didnt. Someone else wrote that. Please keep attributions straight. -- From linux-kernel