From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753239AbXCMLYP (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2007 07:24:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753227AbXCMLYP (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2007 07:24:15 -0400 Received: from 87-194-8-8.bethere.co.uk ([87.194.8.8]:53848 "EHLO aeryn.fluff.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753239AbXCMLYN (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2007 07:24:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:24:11 +0000 From: Ben Dooks To: Maxin John Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Need help on mach-ep93xx Message-ID: <20070313112411.GA24508@fluff.org.uk> References: <9debc4410703122224n5def90e7g4767b95b176941c0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9debc4410703122224n5def90e7g4767b95b176941c0@mail.gmail.com> X-Disclaimer: These are my own opinions, so there! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:54:08AM +0530, Maxin John wrote: > Hi, > > I have one question mach-ep93xx. > > In EP93xx IRQ handling part in core.c, the 2.6.19.2 kernel and > newer kernels are configuring the 16 interrupts of the ports A & B > together. The code is not using the interrupt capability of the port > F which can provide 3 interrupts. > > Why the port F is not configured for interrupts ? > > Thanks in advance, subscribe to the linux-arm-kernel list and ask the question there, you'll find more ARM people there. -- Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'