linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Dan Aloni <da-x@monatomic.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: thread stacks and strict vm overcommit accounting
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:36:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070315153613.3d2eaf10.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070315233343.662b019c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>

On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 23:33:43 +0000
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

> > Stack RSS should certainly be included in Committed_AS,
> > but RLIMIT_STACK merely limits how big the stack vma may grow to:
> > at any moment the stack vma is probably very much smaller,
> > and only its current size is accounted in Committed_AS.
> 
> With a typical size as a fuzz factor preaccounted in later kernels.

Where's that done?

> > > > Is this the intended behaviour?
> > > 
> > > That sounds like a bug to me.
> > 
> > I'm suspecting it's an oddity rather than a bug.
> 
> It is intended behaviour.

Each instance of

main()
{
	sleep(100);
}

appears to increase Committed_AS by around 200kb.  But we've committed to
providing it with 8MB for stack.

How come this is correct?


  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-15 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-13 16:33 thread stacks and strict vm overcommit accounting Dan Aloni
2007-03-15 19:06 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-15 20:37   ` Hugh Dickins
2007-03-15 20:59     ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-03-15 23:33     ` Alan Cox
2007-03-15 22:36       ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-03-15 23:08         ` Hugh Dickins
2007-03-16  1:31           ` Alan Cox
2007-03-16 14:43           ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-03-15 23:42         ` Dan Aloni
2007-03-16  4:29   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070315153613.3d2eaf10.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=da-x@monatomic.org \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).