From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753492AbXCPL2z (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:28:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753496AbXCPL2y (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:28:54 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:43818 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753492AbXCPL2y (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:28:54 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: "Joerg Roedel" Subject: Re: [discuss] [PATCH] x86_64: fix cpu MHz reporting on constant_tsc cpus Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:24:41 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20070313100043.GC21463@amd.com> <200703150001.09390.ak@suse.de> <20070315165047.GY21463@amd.com> In-Reply-To: <20070315165047.GY21463@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703161224.42006.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Yes. You are right. I will fix that and send a new version. Thanks for > the review. I already fixed it up and fixed some other bugs. The changes to tsc_khz in nmi.c were wrong because the performance counters don't tick at tsc frequency. -Andi