From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
xemul@sw.ru, pj@sgi.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
winget@google.com, containers@lists.osdl.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Summary of resource management discussion
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:27:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070316145749.GA4760@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070316141915.GA6572@MAIL.13thfloor.at>
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:19:16PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > Do you see any drawbacks of doing like this? What will break if we do
> > this?
>
> looks good to me, except for the potential issue with
> the double indirection introducing too much overhear
Sure. I plan to get some numbers with and without the indirection in
nsproxy.
I was planning to get these numbers with a prelimnary CPU controller I wrote a
while back (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/28/236 and
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/26/12). Do you have plans to publish any CPU
controller in the short term as well?
--
Regards,
vatsa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-16 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-12 12:42 Summary of resource management discussion Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-03-13 16:24 ` Herbert Poetzl
2007-03-13 17:58 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-03-13 23:50 ` Herbert Poetzl
2007-03-15 11:24 ` Paul Menage
2007-03-15 17:04 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-03-15 19:12 ` Paul Menage
2007-03-16 1:40 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-03-16 20:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-16 14:26 ` Herbert Poetzl
2007-03-16 14:19 ` Herbert Poetzl
2007-03-16 14:57 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2007-03-16 21:23 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070316145749.GA4760@in.ibm.com \
--to=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=winget@google.com \
--cc=xemul@sw.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).