From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965743AbXCSG7o (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 02:59:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965731AbXCSG7o (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 02:59:44 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:1261 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965743AbXCSG7n (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 02:59:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:59:39 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Mike Galbraith Cc: davids@webmaster.com, "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" Subject: Re: RSDL v0.31 Message-ID: <20070319065938.GV943@1wt.eu> References: <1174285307.7498.15.camel@Homer.simpson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1174285307.7498.15.camel@Homer.simpson.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:21:47AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 19:27 -0700, David Schwartz wrote: > > > > Wrong. I call a good job giving a _preference_ to the desktop. I call > > > rigid fairness impractical for the desktop, and a denial of reality. > > > > Assuming you *want* that. It's possible that the desktop may not be > > particularly important and the machine may be doing much more important > > server work with critical latency issues. So if you want that, you have to > > ask for it. > > Amusing argument ;-) I doubt that there are many admins ripping and > encoding CDs on their employers critical production servers. I've known one at least, he said he was ensuring the shiny new dual athlons were stable enough for production ;-) But that does not make a rule. Cheers, Willy