From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754711AbXDZFFd (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:05:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754714AbXDZFFd (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:05:33 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:37762 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754712AbXDZFFQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:05:16 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:02:53 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21 Message-ID: <20070426050253.GA18335@kroah.com> References: <20070426040806.GJ3468@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070426040806.GJ3468@stusta.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:08:06AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > What I will NOT do: > Waste my time with tracking 2.6.22-rc regressions. I sure hope you don't do this. Tracking these is tough, and I think you are doing a great job with it. No release will have no regressions, there's just too many different combinations of hardware and sometimes people don't have the time to test to see if their original report is even fixed or not. And some of them will get fixed with patches coming in the next kernel release, which will then be tracked down and added to the -stable releases. So if you can, please keep it up, if you think it's a thankless job, here's my hearty thanks for doing this work. It's really needed and I really appreciate it. thanks, greg k-h