From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965148AbXD2Rif (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:38:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964934AbXD2RiO (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:38:14 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:58917 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031002AbXD2Rh1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:37:27 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 19:37:25 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Adrian Bunk , Diego Calleja , Chuck Ebbert , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21 Message-ID: <20070429173725.GB30248@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20070426040806.GJ3468@stusta.de> <200704291849.23197.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200704291849.23197.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > My personal experience with bugzilla is that it's very unfriendly to > reporters. IMHO it's suitable for tracking unresolved problems along with > debug patches, system information etc., but not for _reporting_ new ones. What did you find unfriendly? While I also cannot say I love it I don't find it any less unfriendly than an email. Besides the primary point of bug tracking is not to be friendly to someone, but to (a) fix the bugs and (b) know how many bugs there for a given release. Any replacement would need to solve this problem too. Email does not solve it as far as I can see. -Andi