linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com,
	"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-pm <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: always requeue !fs requests at the front
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:05:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070615110544.GR6149@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070615094246.GN29122@htj.dyndns.org>

On Fri, Jun 15 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
> SCSI marks internal commands with REQ_PREEMPT and push it at the front
> of the request queue using blk_execute_rq().  When entering suspended
> or frozen state, SCSI devices are quiesced using
> scsi_device_quiesce().  In quiesced state, only REQ_PREEMPT requests
> are processed.  This is how SCSI blocks other requests out while
> suspending and resuming.  As all internal commands are pushed at the
> front of the queue, this usually works.
> 
> Unfortunately, this interacts badly with ordered requeueing.  To
> preserve request order on requeueing (due to busy device, active EH or
> other failures), requests are sorted according to ordered sequence on
> requeue if IO barrier is in progress.
> 
> The following sequence deadlocks.
> 
> 1. IO barrier sequence issues.
> 
> 2. Suspend requested.  Queue is quiesced with part of all of IO
>    barrier sequence at the front.
> 
> 3. During suspending or resuming, SCSI issues internal command which
>    gets deferred and requeued for some reason.  As the command is
>    issued after the IO barrier in #1, ordered requeueing code puts the
>    request after IO barrier sequence.
> 
> 4. The device is ready to process requests again but still is in
>    quiesced state and the first request of the queue isn't
>    REQ_PREEMPT, so command processing is deadlocked -
>    suspending/resuming waits for the issued request to complete while
>    the request can't be processed till device is put back into
>    running state by resuming.
> 
> This can be fixed by always putting !fs requests at the front when
> requeueing.
> 
> The following thread reports this deadlock.
> 
>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/537473
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jenn Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> Cc: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
> ---
> Okay, it took a lot of hours of debugging but boiled down to two liner
> fix.  I feel so empty. :-) RAID6 triggers this reliably because it
> uses BIO_BARRIER heavily to update its superblock.  The recent ATA
> suspend/resume rewrite is hit by this because it uses SCSI internal
> commands to spin down and up the drives for suspending and resuming.
> 
> David, please test this.  Jens, does it look okay?

Yep looks good, except for the bad multi-line comment style, but that's
minor stuff ;-)

Acked-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-15 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-01 21:23 2.6.22-rc3 hibernate(?) disables skge wol David Greaves
2007-06-01 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-01 22:37   ` 2.6.22-rc3 hibernate(?) fails totally - regression David Greaves
2007-06-01 23:22     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-02 22:31       ` David Greaves
2007-06-02 22:46         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-03 15:03           ` David Greaves
2007-06-06  8:33             ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-06 10:18               ` [PATCH] sata_promise: use TF interface for polling NODATA commands Tejun Heo
2007-06-06 10:19                 ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-06 10:39               ` 2.6.22-rc3 hibernate(?) fails totally - regression (xfs on raid6) David Greaves
2007-06-07  5:53                 ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-07 10:30                   ` David Greaves
2007-06-07 11:07                     ` David Chinner
2007-06-07 13:59                       ` David Greaves
2007-06-07 22:28                         ` David Chinner
2007-06-08 19:09                           ` David Greaves
2007-06-12 18:43                             ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-13 11:16                               ` David Greaves
2007-06-13 21:04                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-13 21:22                                   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-13 22:02                                   ` David Greaves
2007-06-13 22:12                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-13 23:15                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-14 14:21                                         ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-14 15:10                                           ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-15  9:42                                             ` [PATCH] block: always requeue !fs requests at the front Tejun Heo
2007-06-15 11:05                                               ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2007-06-15 11:17                                                 ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-15 11:21                                                   ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-15 15:08                                                   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-16 19:54                                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-06-17  7:29                                                   ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-17  8:03                                                     ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-15 13:58                                               ` David Greaves
2007-06-14 15:19                                           ` 2.6.22-rc3 hibernate(?) fails totally - regression (xfs on raid6) David Greaves
2007-06-14  0:28                                 ` David Chinner
2007-06-12 12:31                           ` David Greaves
2007-06-10 18:43                         ` Pavel Machek
2007-06-12 18:00                           ` David Greaves
2007-06-12 21:31                             ` Pavel Machek
2007-06-07 13:45                     ` Duane Griffin
2007-06-07 14:00                       ` David Greaves
2007-06-07 14:05                         ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-07 14:36                           ` Mark Lord
2007-06-07 15:20                             ` David Greaves
2007-06-07 16:58                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-07 20:12                     ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070615110544.GR6149@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@dgreaves.com \
    --cc=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).