From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1753836AbXFVFZz@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753836AbXFVFZz (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 22 Jun 2007 01:25:55 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751249AbXFVFZs
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 22 Jun 2007 01:25:48 -0400
Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:57087 "EHLO
	ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750881AbXFVFZr (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 22 Jun 2007 01:25:47 -0400
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 06:25:44 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Cc: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
Message-ID: <20070622052544.GV21478@ftp.linux.org.uk>
References: <orlkedpryc.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20070622011812.GF30132@brong.net> <orwsxwfvzj.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <orwsxwfvzj.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:34:24AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> I take it that removing barriers to cooperation in GPLv3 by default is
> undesirable.  Well, then, what can I say?

That It's All Their[kernel developers'] Fault(tm), of course.

> I tried.  :-(

Or that, indeed.