From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758660AbXFVPcy (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:32:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757395AbXFVPcr (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:32:47 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:38034 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757142AbXFVPcq (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:32:46 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:32:32 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Chris Wright Cc: Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] CONFIG_PARAVIRT and CONFIG_MCOUNT don't play well together Message-ID: <20070622153232.GA31848@elte.hu> References: <20070622080634.GP3723@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <20070622083330.GB19382@elte.hu> <20070622152915.GQ3723@sequoia.sous-sol.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070622152915.GQ3723@sequoia.sous-sol.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Chris Wright wrote: > > thanks! I ran into this before and asked for the fastcalls to not be > > removed from upstream paravirt.c but to no avail it seems. It does > > no harm to anyone to keep the 'fastcall' declarations and > > definitions for places where _actual assembly code_ depends on the > > calling convention. Could someone please send this upstream-wards > > too? > > Yes, I agree, it's actually documenting the subtlety of the calling > convention, not just noise in the source. The upstream patch is > different, I'll sort one out. great! Ingo