From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761305AbXFWQxr (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jun 2007 12:53:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761071AbXFWQxZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jun 2007 12:53:25 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:43221 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761056AbXFWQxX (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jun 2007 12:53:23 -0400 Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:51:57 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Eric Sandeen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, cluster-devel@redhat.com, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] zero_user_page conversion Message-Id: <20070623095157.5a574afb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <4679A558.1010107@redhat.com> References: <4679A558.1010107@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:08:24 -0500 Eric Sandeen wrote: > Use zero_user_page() in cifs, ocfs2, ext4, and gfs2 where possible. One patch, splattered across four maintainers, each of whom maintain separate trees. Sigh. Please, don't. _someone_ has to split this up, and it might as well not be me.