From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756563AbXFYQfP (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:35:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752634AbXFYQfE (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:35:04 -0400 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:49729 "HELO xenotime.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752457AbXFYQfD (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:35:03 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:37:12 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Lennart Sorensen , Grozdan Nikolov , Bernd Petrovitsch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: How innovative is Linux? Message-Id: <20070625093712.850557f8.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: References: <200706231417.16086.microchip@chello.be> <1182621207.3683.0.camel@gimli.at.home> <200706232015.33527.microchip@chello.be> <20070625151226.GJ10008@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.2 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:15:50 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Jun 25 2007 11:12, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > > >It is also quite likely the reply was written before reading the other > >comments. With the volume on lkml, reading all comments in a thread > >before writing any replies is just not possible. > > Perhaps the list needs to be split up, e.g. linux-politics@vger :) I'm for that (including a place for GPL discussions), but I think that people would still just overload lkml instead of using the split lists. --- ~Randy (resent due to failure on first attempt)