From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755778AbXF0JOg (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2007 05:14:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752174AbXF0JOa (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2007 05:14:30 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.13]:28173 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752127AbXF0JO2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2007 05:14:28 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to: references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=f4ZZaywvQiyu+HCljZnAKCxVVAvxAKyn8O8mm0VbNnX/EPIRO7MvZdWtYoJmDYvJO 3PgSs2mAVMI/TUqjHIrFA== Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 02:14:08 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Ethan Solomita , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl Subject: Re: [RFC 1/7] cpuset write dirty map Message-Id: <20070627021408.493812fe.akpm@google.com> In-Reply-To: References: <465FB6CF.4090801@google.com> <46646A33.6090107@google.com> <468023CA.2090401@google.com> <20070626152204.b6b4bc3f.akpm@google.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Is in my queue somewhere. Could be that by the time I get to it it will > > need refreshing (again), we'll see. > > > > One open question is the interaction between these changes and with Peter's > > per-device-dirty-throttling changes. They also are in my queue somewhere. > > Having a 100:1 coder:reviewer ratio doesn't exactly make for swift > > progress. > > Hmmmm.. How can we help? I can look at some aspects of Peter's per device > throttling. That can't hurt. I'm more concerned about all of Mel's code in -mm actually. I don't recall anyone doing a full review recently and I'm still not sure that this is the overall direction in which we wish to go. Last time I asked this everyone seemed a bit waffly and non-committal.