From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757161AbXF0DcU (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2007 23:32:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752269AbXF0DcM (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2007 23:32:12 -0400 Received: from [212.12.190.23] ([212.12.190.23]:32810 "EHLO raad.intranet" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751327AbXF0DcL (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2007 23:32:11 -0400 From: Al Boldi To: Alexandre Oliva Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 06:32:41 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200706172319.22381.a1426z@gawab.com> <200706261344.23906.a1426z@gawab.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200706270632.41728.a1426z@gawab.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Jun 26, 2007, Al Boldi wrote: > > I read your scenario of the vendor not giving you the source to mean: > > not directly; i.e. they could give you a third-party download link. > > This has never been enough to comply with GPLv2. Section 3a of the GPLv2 mentions "a medium customarily used for software interchange". I would think the Internet is a medium customarily used for software interchange, is it not? Thanks! -- Al