From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763196AbXHFQRS (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:17:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753786AbXHFQRG (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:17:06 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:35916 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753593AbXHFQRF (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:17:05 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:16:34 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Dave Jones , Alan Cox , J??rn Engel , Jeff Garzik , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , linux-mm@kvack.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , miklos@szeredi.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, neilb@suse.de, dgc@sgi.com, tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com, nikita@clusterfs.com, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, yingchao.zhou@gmail.com, richard@rsk.demon.co.uk, david@lang.hm Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 Message-ID: <20070806161634.GA1862@elte.hu> References: <20070804191205.GA24723@lazybastard.org> <20070804192130.GA25346@elte.hu> <20070804211156.5f600d80@the-village.bc.nu> <20070804202830.GA4538@elte.hu> <20070804210351.GA9784@elte.hu> <20070804225121.5c7b66e0@the-village.bc.nu> <20070805072141.GA4414@elte.hu> <20070805184408.GB22639@redhat.com> <20070806063909.GB31321@elte.hu> <20070806155919.GA21066@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070806155919.GA21066@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7-deb -1.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Dave Jones wrote: > > does it work with the "atime on steroids" patch below? (no need to > > configure anything, just apply the patch and go.) > > people have reported that relatime does work, but my util-linux isn't > new enough to support it, so I've never got it to work. I'll give your > diff a try later, though as it seems to be equivalent I expect it'll > work. would still be nice if you could test it and report back :) Ingo