From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764027AbXKJDxf (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2007 22:53:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760108AbXKJDxZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2007 22:53:25 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:46480 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759562AbXKJDxY (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2007 22:53:24 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 19:53:03 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: David Howells Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-am33-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] MN10300: Add the MN10300/AM33 architecture to the kernel [try #5] Message-Id: <20071109195303.edbdc631.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20071109153458.20803.10594.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <20071109153432.20803.69832.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20071109153458.20803.10594.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:34:58 +0000 David Howells wrote: > Add architecture support for the MN10300/AM33 CPUs produced by MEI to the > kernel. hm, kprobes and gdb support. ho hum, I've seen worse-looking code ;). There's quite a bit of the usual stuff in there: use of SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, a forest of fishy-looking volatiles, but I don't need to sit here and emulate checkpatch.pl. I googled a bit but most of the mn10300 info pertains to linux kernel and gcc. Who is using this CPU and in what applications?