From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764219AbXKNT4W (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:56:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760111AbXKNT4H (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:56:07 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:46544 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754356AbXKNT4E (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:56:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:56:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20071114.115601.00715073.davem@davemloft.net> To: mingo@elte.hu Cc: rdunlap@xenotime.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org, protasnb@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20071114140847.GA11489@elte.hu> References: <20071113134029.GA30978@elte.hu> <20071113085514.3414aa52.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20071114140847.GA11489@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ingo Molnar Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100 > In fact this thread is the very example: David points out that on netdev > some of those bugs were already discussed and resolved. Had it been all > on lkml we'd all be aware of it. That's a rediculious argument. One other reason these bugs are resolved, is that the networking developers only need to subscribe to netdev and not have to listen to all the noise on lkml. People who want to manage bugs know what list to look on and contact about problems. Dumping even more crap on lkml is not the answer.