From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754393AbXKUSfm (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:35:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751527AbXKUSfd (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:35:33 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:45594 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750716AbXKUSfc (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:35:32 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:35:31 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20071121.103531.267691506.davem@davemloft.net> To: jeff@garzik.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] SO_NO_CHECK for IPv6 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20071121124532.GA17263@havoc.gtf.org> References: <20071121124532.GA17263@havoc.gtf.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jeff Garzik Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:45:32 -0500 > > SO_NO_CHECK support for IPv6 appeared to be missing. This is presented, > based on a reading of net/ipv4/udp.c. > > I wonder if IPv4's CHECKSUM_PARTIAL check from udp_push_pending_frames() > also needs to be copied to IPv6? > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik IPV6 specifies that, unlike ipv4, this no-checksum behavior is not allowed.