linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明" <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Cc: jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] SO_NO_CHECK for IPv6
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:46:21 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071122.114621.02788123.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071122023403.GA3409@gondor.apana.org.au>

In article <20071122023403.GA3409@gondor.apana.org.au> (at Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:34:03 +0800), Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> says:

> On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 07:17:40PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > For those interested, I am dealing with a UDP app that already does very 
> > strong checksumming and encryption, so additional software checksumming 
> > at the lower layers is quite simply a waste of CPU cycles.  Hardware 
> > checksumming is fine, as long as its "free."
> 
> No matter how strong your underlying checksumming is it's not
> going to protect the IPv6 header is it :)

In that sense, we should use AH.

--yoshfuji

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-22  2:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-21 12:45 [RFC/PATCH] SO_NO_CHECK for IPv6 Jeff Garzik
2007-11-21 13:20 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2007-11-21 13:42   ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-22  0:17   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-11-22  2:34     ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-22  2:46       ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 [this message]
2007-11-23  1:13     ` David Miller
2007-11-23  6:06       ` David Schwartz
2007-11-24  6:00         ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-25 15:41           ` David Schwartz
2007-11-26  2:47             ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-21 18:35 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071122.114621.02788123.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    --to=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).