From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1755896AbXLBN5p@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755896AbXLBN5p (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 2 Dec 2007 08:57:45 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752373AbXLBN5i
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 2 Dec 2007 08:57:38 -0500
Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:59326 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752264AbXLBN5h (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 2 Dec 2007 08:57:37 -0500
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 14:57:11 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Cc: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
       Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       len.brown@intel.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
       rjw@sisk.pl
Subject: Re: [BUG] Strange 1-second pauses during Resume-from-RAM
Message-ID: <20071202135711.GA20434@elte.hu>
References: <20071130134312.GA32273@elte.hu> <20071130183510.GA1570@lazybastard.org> <20071130184625.GB9928@elte.hu> <20071201151650.GA5031@lazybastard.org> <20071201183256.GA14052@elte.hu> <20071201204747.GA6458@lazybastard.org> <20071201205456.GA8231@elte.hu> <20071201234112.GA7209@lazybastard.org> <20071202085607.GA28966@elte.hu> <20071202113143.GA9378@lazybastard.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20071202113143.GA9378@lazybastard.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean
X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5
X-ELTE-SpamLevel: 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3
	-1.5 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Jörn Engel <joern@logfs.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 2 December 2007 09:56:08 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Jörn Engel <joern@logfs.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > > ah. You should mark pit_read() function as notrace. PIT clocksource 
> > > > is rare. (add the 'notrace' word to the function prototype)
> > > 
> > > Hardly a change at all.  Apart from some offsets, this dump is 
> > > identical.
> > > 
> > > stopped custom tracer.
> > > BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0, sh/954
> > >  lock: c030f280, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: sh/954, .owner_cpu: 0
> > > Pid: 954, comm: sh Not tainted 2.6.24-rc3-ge1cca7e8-dirty #3
> > >  [<c0103a04>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x35/0x54
> > >  [<c010450a>] show_trace+0x2c/0x2e
> > >  [<c0104e6d>] dump_stack+0x84/0x8a
> > >  [<c01ded7c>] spin_bug+0xa7/0xae
> > >  [<c01def14>] _raw_spin_lock+0x45/0xfa
> > >  [<c02a02b1>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x68/0x7a
> > >  [<c01087e2>] pit_read+0xf/0x91
> > >  [<c0130ee1>] get_monotonic_cycles+0xf/0x2d
> > >  [<c013c0e7>] now+0x2a/0x7c
> > >  [<c013c333>] ____trace+0x4d/0x1e8
> > >  [<c013dbeb>] __mcount+0x95/0xa6
> > >  [<c010d354>] mcount+0x14/0x18
> > >  [<c0135a3c>] lock_acquired+0xe/0x1d7
> > >  [<c02a02b9>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x70/0x7a
> > >  [<c01087e2>] pit_read+0xf/0x91
> > 
> > hm, it seems lock_acquired() [in kernel/lockdep.c] needs to be marked 
> > 'notrace' too - otherwise we recurse back into pit_read().
> 
> This time not even the offsets have changed.  Dump is identical.

hm, do you have CONFIG_FRAME_POINTERS=y, i.e. are the dumps reliable?

	Ingo