From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756003AbXLBN6Z (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Dec 2007 08:58:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752373AbXLBN6R (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Dec 2007 08:58:17 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:59398 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750808AbXLBN6Q (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Dec 2007 08:58:16 -0500 Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 14:57:55 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel Cc: Mark Lord , Pavel Machek , Mark Lord , Thomas Gleixner , len.brown@intel.com, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, rjw@sisk.pl Subject: Re: [BUG] Strange 1-second pauses during Resume-from-RAM Message-ID: <20071202135755.GB20434@elte.hu> References: <20071130183510.GA1570@lazybastard.org> <20071130184625.GB9928@elte.hu> <20071201151650.GA5031@lazybastard.org> <20071201183256.GA14052@elte.hu> <20071201204747.GA6458@lazybastard.org> <20071201205456.GA8231@elte.hu> <20071201234112.GA7209@lazybastard.org> <20071202085607.GA28966@elte.hu> <20071202113143.GA9378@lazybastard.org> <20071202123125.GA9516@lazybastard.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20071202123125.GA9516@lazybastard.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jörn Engel wrote: > On Sun, 2 December 2007 12:31:43 +0100, Jörn Engel wrote: > > > > This time not even the offsets have changed. Dump is identical. > > After another ten or so notrace annotations throughout the spinlock > code, the latency tracer appears to work. Not sure how many useful > information is missing through all the annotations, though. a few annotations out of thousands of function calls in the kernel it's usually not significant. Ingo