From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753931AbXLCOjn (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:39:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752609AbXLCOjf (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:39:35 -0500 Received: from 87-194-8-8.bethere.co.uk ([87.194.8.8]:49280 "EHLO kira.home.fluff.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752087AbXLCOjf (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:39:35 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 14:39:26 +0000 From: Ben Dooks To: Matt Porter Cc: Pierre Ossman , Vitaly Luban , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support Message-ID: <20071203143926.GC7855@fluff.org.uk> References: <47511ADA.20506@luban.org> <20071201215010.2fa3b334@poseidon.drzeus.cx> <20071203142207.GA28101@gate.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071203142207.GA28101@gate.crashing.org> X-Disclaimer: These are my own opinions, so there! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 08:22:07AM -0600, Matt Porter wrote: > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:50:10PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > As for the patch, it's a big NAK at this point. Vendors who can't be bothered to follow > > the standard will have to wait for Ben's separation patches before they can be supported. > > Then they can have some voodoo front-end to handle their mistakes instead of turning > > sdhci.c into a collection of hacks and workarounds. > > What's the status of Ben's separation patches? I haven't seen a posting of those > versus a recent kernel. I've got some SDHCI driver glue for the non-pci Arasan core > running in an older kernel tree with those patches. It's just waiting for the separation > patches to hit the mmc or mainline tree. I need to go back and try and sort out the last of Pierre's last comments, and update to the latest kernel version. I was waiting for 2.6.24-rc4 to re-start the effort to try and ensure there are fewer changes due to fixes. -- Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'