From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754553AbXLEMa7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:30:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751739AbXLEMaw (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:30:52 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:52101 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750892AbXLEMav (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:30:51 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:30:33 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Joerg Roedel Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86_64: define all _PAGE_* in terms of _PAGE_BIT_* Message-ID: <20071205123033.GA15394@elte.hu> References: <11966016811565-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <11966016814058-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <20071204123809.GD27286@elte.hu> <20071204150652.GJ6945@amd.com> <20071204210751.GH32018@elte.hu> <20071205105236.GB23093@amd.com> <20071205112758.GA6143@elte.hu> <20071205114225.GC23093@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071205114225.GC23093@amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > > > Sorry, forgot to check the patches before submission. Will > > > > > cleanup and resubmit soon. > > > > > > > > please if possible send a delta against x86.git, not a > > > > replacement patch. It's easier for the patchflow. > > > > > > Not sure I understand you right here. Do you mean a patch on top > > > of my previous patches? > > > > yeah - that's easier to pick up for me (because i've already got > > your series applied), and it's also easier for you as well. It also > > makes sense to generally split style fixes from substantial patches. > > (in the cases where there are pre-existing style problems in the > > code) > > Ok, thanks. Will prepare a patch on top of my first patch series. it's all in the mm branch of x86.git: git-clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git linux-2.6.git cd linux-2.6.git git-branch x86 # (1) git-checkout x86 git-pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git mm so the easiest is to do patches just against that tree. NOTE: the x86.git tree is frequently regenerated, so it can not be rolling upgraded the usual git way via typing 'git-pull' - you have to zap your x86 branch and re-pull: git-checkout master git-branch -D x86 # this zaps everything! and repeat from (1) above. Ingo