linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Holger.Wolf@de.ibm.com
Cc: wolf@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@elte.hu, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scheduler behaviour
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:26:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071205132631.79940bd5@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <475706E2.50805@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:15:30 +0100
Holger Wolf <wolf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> We discovered performance degradation with dbench when using kernel
> 2.6.23 compared to kernel 2.6.22.
> 
> In our case we booted a Linux in a IBM System z9 LPAR with 256MB of
> ram with 4 CPU's. This system uses a striped LV with 16 disks on a
> Storage Server connected via 8 4GBit links.
> A dbench was started on that system performing I/O operations on the
> striped LV. dbench runs were performed with 1 to 62 processes.
> Measurements with a 2.6.22 kernel were compared to measurements with
> a 2.6.23 kernel. We saw a throughput degradation from 7.2 to 23.4

this is good news!
dbench rewards unfair behavior... so higher dbench usually means a
worse kernel ;)


-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-12-05 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-05 20:15 Scheduler behaviour Holger Wolf
2007-12-05 21:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-12-05 21:21   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-05 21:26 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2007-12-06 21:53   ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-12-07 16:29   ` Holger Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071205132631.79940bd5@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=Holger.Wolf@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=wolf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).