From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755516AbXLGA3w (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2007 19:29:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753060AbXLGA3n (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2007 19:29:43 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:39114 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752217AbXLGA3m (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2007 19:29:42 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:29:15 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Daniel Phillips Cc: davidsen@tmr.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] A clean approach to writeout throttling Message-Id: <20071206162915.a3917d1c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <200712061604.41490.phillips@phunq.net> References: <200712051603.02183.phillips@phunq.net> <200712052221.45409.phillips@phunq.net> <47586F59.5090507@tmr.com> <200712061604.41490.phillips@phunq.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:04:41 -0800 Daniel Phillips wrote: > The runner up key idea is that we will gain a notion of "block device > stack" (or block stack for short, so that we may implement block > stackers) which for the time being will simply be Device Mapper's > notion of device stack, however many warts that may have. It's there > now and we use it for ddsnap. Perhaps all we need to track is the outermost point? submit_bio(...) { bool remove_the_rq = false; ... if (current->the_rq == NULL) { current->the_rq = rq; remove_the_rq = true; } ... if (remove_the_rq) current->the_rq = NULL; } ?