From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754505AbXLLRVS (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:21:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751114AbXLLRVE (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:21:04 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:55116 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751087AbXLLRVC (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:21:02 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:20:19 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, glommer@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, ehabkost@redhat.com, jeremy@goop.org, avi@qumranet.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, ak@suse.de, chrisw@sous-sol.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, hpa@zytor.com, zach@vmware.com, roland@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/19] desc_struct integration Message-ID: <20071212172019.GA11258@elte.hu> References: <1196957800568-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> <11974640441088-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <11974640441088-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote: > Since the last version of it received no comments on the interfaces, > here it goes a version, that I feel ready for inclusion. > > The comments regarding style, specially the elimination of the > #defines in the desc_struct definition were merged. I also implemented > the vmi functions, missing last time. > > Ingo, in the absense of further complaints, could you please push to > the x86 tree? yeah, i've added them. Ingo