From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
Cc: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ?
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:39:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071213193937.GG10104@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <476188C4.9030802@rtr.ca>
On Thu, Dec 13 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
> Mark Lord wrote:
> >Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>On Thu, Dec 13 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
> >>>Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >>>>On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 01:48:18PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> >>>>>Problem confirmed. 2.6.23.8 regularly generates segments up to
> >>>>>64KB for libata,
> >>>>>but 2.6.24 uses only 4KB segments and a *few* 8KB segments.
> >>>>Just a suspicion ... could this be slab vs slub? ie check your configs
> >>>>are the same / similar between the two kernels.
> >>>..
> >>>
> >>>Mmmm.. a good thought, that one.
> >>>But I just rechecked, and both have CONFIG_SLAB=y
> >>>
> >>>My guess is that something got changed around when Jens
> >>>reworked the block layer for 2.6.24.
> >>>I'm going to dig around in there now.
> >>
> >>I didn't rework the block layer for 2.6.24 :-). The core block layer
> >>changes since 2.6.23 are:
> >>
> >>- Support for empty barriers. Not a likely candidate.
> >>- Shared tag queue fixes. Totally unlikely.
> >>- sg chaining support. Not likely.
> >>- The bio changes from Neil. Of the bunch, the most likely suspects in
> >> this area, since it changes some of the code involved with merges and
> >> blk_rq_map_sg().
> >>- Lots of simple stuff, again very unlikely.
> >>
> >>Anyway, it sounds odd for this to be a block layer problem if you do see
> >>occasional segments being merged. So it sounds more like the input data
> >>having changed.
> >>
> >>Why not just bisect it?
> >..
> >
> >Because the early 2.6.24 series failed to boot on this machine
> >due to bugs in the block layer -- so the code that caused this regression
> >is probably in the stuff from before the kernels became usable here.
> ..
>
> That sounds more harsh than intended --> the earlier 2.6.24 kernels (up to
> the first couple of -rc* ones failed here because of incompatibilities
> between the block/bio changes and libata.
>
> That's better, I think!
No worries, I didn't pick it up as harsh just as an odd conclusion :-)
If I were you, I'd just start from the first -rc that booted for you. If
THAT has the bug, then we'll think of something else. If you don't get
anywhere, I can run some tests tomorrow and see if I can reproduce it
here.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-13 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-13 18:36 QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ? Mark Lord
2007-12-13 18:37 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 18:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-12-13 18:46 ` James Bottomley
2007-12-13 18:48 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 18:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-12-13 19:03 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 19:26 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 19:30 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 19:32 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 19:39 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2007-12-13 19:42 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 19:53 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 19:59 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 20:05 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 20:02 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 20:06 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 20:09 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 20:14 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 20:18 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 20:21 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 22:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-13 22:15 ` James Bottomley
2007-12-13 22:29 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-13 22:33 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 23:13 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14 0:05 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14 0:30 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14 0:37 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-14 0:42 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14 0:46 ` [PATCH] fix page_alloc for larger I/O segments (improved) Mark Lord
2007-12-14 0:57 ` James Bottomley
2007-12-14 1:11 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-14 2:23 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14 17:42 ` Mel Gorman
2007-12-14 18:07 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-16 21:56 ` Mel Gorman
2007-12-14 18:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-12-14 18:30 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-20 22:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-12-14 0:47 ` QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ? Mark Lord
2007-12-14 11:50 ` Mel Gorman
2007-12-14 13:57 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14 0:40 ` [PATCH] fix page_alloc for larger I/O segments Mark Lord
2007-12-14 1:03 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-14 4:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-12-15 1:09 ` QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ? Mel Gorman
2007-12-15 2:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-15 5:55 ` Matt Mackall
2007-12-16 21:55 ` Mel Gorman
2007-12-17 19:24 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-12-18 2:42 ` Matt Mackall
2007-12-13 22:17 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 22:02 ` VM allocates pages in reverse order again Matthew Wilcox
2007-12-13 19:37 ` QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ? Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 19:53 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071213193937.GG10104@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).