From: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
"Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [usb regression] Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-rc3] Fix /proc/net breakage
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:13:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080102061308.GB30929@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080102060006.GA27693@kroah.com>
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 10:00:06PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Ok, no, I didn't write that patch, I'm getting very confused here.
>
> In 2.6.24-rc6 there is no usage of debugfs in the ohci driver.
>
> In the -mm tree there is a patch, from Tony Jones, that moves some debug
> code out of sysfs and into debugfs where it belongs. It does it for
> both the ehci and ohci USB host controller drivers, and this is the code
> that is incorrect if CONFIG_DEBUGFS is not enabled.
>
> So, for the 2.6.24 release, nothing needs to be changed, all is good,
> and there is no regression.
>
> Right? Or am I still confused about this whole thing?
Probably, since I also wasn't sure about this getting added to the
post-2.6.23 regressions. I'd expect this problem to be -mm only myself,
but then I didn't actively verify it in code (and I haven't tried -rc6
proper on that machine yet either, build takes ages ;).
OK, since I cannot really offer anything other than positive feelings about
this being non-rc6 breakage, should I try -rc6 proper, too?
> Hm, I wonder if this means I can go back to drinking more holiday
> wine... :)
.....even more confusion? :)
Thanks for your help,
Andreas Mohr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-02 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-19 19:10 2.6.24-rc3: find complains about /proc/net Pavel Machek
2007-11-19 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-20 15:51 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2007-11-20 21:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-11-20 21:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 22:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-11-20 22:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 22:54 ` Roland McGrath
2007-11-20 23:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 23:06 ` Guillaume Chazarain
2007-11-20 23:26 ` Roland McGrath
2007-11-20 23:32 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-11-20 23:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 23:51 ` Roland McGrath
2007-11-21 0:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-11-21 1:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-21 0:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-11-20 23:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 22:41 ` [PATCH] proc: Fix the threaded /proc/self Eric W. Biederman
2007-11-20 22:58 ` Guillaume Chazarain
2007-11-20 23:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-21 1:19 ` 2.6.24-rc3: find complains about /proc/net Eric W. Biederman
2007-11-21 6:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-11-21 9:36 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2007-11-24 23:34 ` [CFT][PATCH] proc_net: Remove userspace visible changes Eric W. Biederman
2007-11-26 8:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-11-26 22:17 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc3] Fix /proc/net breakage Eric W. Biederman
2007-11-27 11:20 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2007-11-27 12:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-12-07 4:51 ` David Woodhouse
2007-12-07 10:23 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-07 11:11 ` Denis V. Lunev
2007-12-27 17:40 ` Andreas Mohr
2007-12-27 18:41 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-12-27 22:17 ` Andreas Mohr
2007-12-28 6:22 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-12-28 7:21 ` Andreas Mohr
2007-12-30 16:14 ` [usb regression] " Ingo Molnar
2007-12-30 20:34 ` Alan Stern
2007-12-31 5:25 ` Greg KH
2007-12-31 17:49 ` Alan Stern
2007-12-31 19:26 ` Greg KH
2008-01-02 6:00 ` Greg KH
2008-01-02 6:13 ` Andreas Mohr [this message]
2008-01-02 7:14 ` Greg KH
2008-01-02 15:56 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-02 18:48 ` David Brownell
2008-01-02 6:04 ` Andreas Mohr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080102061308.GB30929@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de \
--to=andi@lisas.de \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).