From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754917AbYAIDvd (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 22:51:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751339AbYAIDvZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 22:51:25 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:48629 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751944AbYAIDvY (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 22:51:24 -0500 From: Len Brown Organization: Intel Open Source Technology Center To: Rene Herman Subject: Re: pnpacpi : exceeded the max number of IO resources Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 22:50:50 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: yakui.zhao@intel.com, shaohua.li@intel.com, Chris Holvenstot , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hidave.darkstar@gmail.com, bjorn.helgaas@hp.com, trenn@suse.de, Andrew Morton References: <1196428488.7066.6.camel@localhost> <47508D3C.9050507@keyaccess.nl> <475436A3.90906@keyaccess.nl> In-Reply-To: <475436A3.90906@keyaccess.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801082250.51026.lenb@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Well, yes, the warning is actually new as well. Previously your kernel > > just silently ignored 8 more mem resources than it does now it seems. > > > > Given that people are hitting these limits, it might make sense to just > > do away with the warning for 2.6.24 again while waiting for the dynamic > > code? > > Ping. Should these warnings be reverted for 2.6.24? No. I don't think hiding this issue again is a good idea. I'd rather live with people complaining about an addition dmesg line. -Len