From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753959AbYAVMDd (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:03:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752016AbYAVMDY (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:03:24 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:56617 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751727AbYAVMDX (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:03:23 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:02:07 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Eduardo Habkost Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, glommer@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, jeremy@goop.org, avi@qumranet.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, ak@suse.de, chrisw@sous-sol.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, hpa@zytor.com, zach@vmware.com, roland@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] paravirt_ops-64 compile fixes Message-ID: <20080122120207.GA30271@elte.hu> References: <1200952133-31581-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1200952133-31581-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Eduardo Habkost wrote: > This series contain fixes to make the paravirt_ops code compile and > boot on x86_64. > > This is a follow-up for the previous series from Glauber. thanks Eduardo, i've applied your fixes. could you perhaps send the missing bits that add the missing 64-bit Kconfig entries? Even if the 64-bit side is not functional yet as a real guest, it would help us find the build bugs and any runtime regressions PARAVIRT might cause on the native 64-bit side of the kernel. Or is it now just a matter of removing all the depends-on X86_32 bits in arch/x86/Kconfig? Ingo