From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752985AbYAWLLm (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:11:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751397AbYAWLLe (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:11:34 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:57767 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750807AbYAWLLe (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:11:34 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on x86 Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:11:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, apw@shadowen.org References: <20080118153529.12646.5260.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> <200801231145.14915.andi@firstfloor.org> <20080123105757.GE21455@csn.ul.ie> In-Reply-To: <20080123105757.GE21455@csn.ul.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801231211.43637.andi@firstfloor.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > I was pretty sure that a !NUMAQ i386 CONFIG_NUMA build > > already used that. > > Presumably a GENERICARCH configuration GENERICARCH includes SUMMIT so yes. > > At least that was the case when I last looked. If that > > has changed it must have bitrotted recently. > > I don't think it has bit-rotted. I was just not using a GENERICARCH > configuration. And no SUMMIT either? Ok you already answered that later. -Andi