From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753400AbYAWLPx (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:15:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751397AbYAWLPp (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:15:45 -0500 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:58573 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750710AbYAWLPp (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:15:45 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on x86 II Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:15:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, apw@shadowen.org References: <20080118153529.12646.5260.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> <200801231145.14915.andi@firstfloor.org> <20080123105757.GE21455@csn.ul.ie> In-Reply-To: <20080123105757.GE21455@csn.ul.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801231215.56741.andi@firstfloor.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Anyways from your earlier comments it sounds like you're trying to add SRAT parsing to CONFIG_NUMAQ. Since that's redundant with the old implementation it doesn't sound like a very useful thing to do. But the patch is applied already i think. Well I'm sure it passed checkpatch.pl at least. -Andi