From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1755519AbYAYPof@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755519AbYAYPof (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:44:35 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752705AbYAYPo1
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:44:27 -0500
Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:45552 "EHLO
	lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752686AbYAYPo0 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:44:26 -0500
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:40:39 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, akpm@osdl.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for mm] Remove iBCS support
Message-ID: <20080125164039.2542bd96@core>
In-Reply-To: <479945ED.7040007@davidnewall.com>
References: <20080120055544.GB19861@one.firstfloor.org>
	<4792E8E2.1090307@davidnewall.com>
	<20080120072922.GA21047@one.firstfloor.org>
	<4793F775.6090403@davidnewall.com>
	<20080122111205.GA25090@elte.hu>
	<4796081A.7060505@davidnewall.com>
	<20080122160114.GB23277@does.not.exist>
	<4798C511.8070305@davidnewall.com>
	<20080124172414.GD4476@does.not.exist>
	<4798D10C.6090109@davidnewall.com>
	<20080124181442.GE4476@does.not.exist>
	<479945ED.7040007@davidnewall.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street,
 Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a
 Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Who said nobody is willing to implement it?  We've all recently learned
> that there is a patch.  From there to implementation is much closer than
> you or I thought last week.  So already this discussion has prompted
> tangible benefit.

And whoever does the work can put the code back. It's not a big deal. So
- get it sorted, polished and as I said before - send patches -. The
amount of time you've spent making mailing list noise should have been
sufficient to do the code instead.