From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1755341AbYDILbe@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755341AbYDILbe (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 9 Apr 2008 07:31:34 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752898AbYDILb0
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 9 Apr 2008 07:31:26 -0400
Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:56833 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752768AbYDILbZ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 9 Apr 2008 07:31:25 -0400
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:31:09 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@gmail.com>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9
Message-ID: <20080409113109.GA25186@elte.hu>
References: <20080409185309.b94c9d15.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <d711229d0804090400p1c92a158j381b86e207a6f38a@mail.gmail.com> <20080409210936.ec8ea986.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080409212719.7d834c13.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080409212719.7d834c13.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean
X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5
X-ELTE-SpamLevel: 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3
	-1.5 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0002]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Jacek,
> 
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 21:09:36 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the report, can you please send us your .config, please?
> 
> Don't worry about it, I found the problem.
> 
> It seems that commit 883a9fc4e5d9b0701f15d4e5a23608f942104721 ("x86: 
> cleanup - rename VM_MASK to X86_VM_MASK") from the x86 tree seems to 
> have missed some places.

i think what happened is that some changes came in from other trees that 
reintroduced the old symbols?

if that's the case i'll add back the old symbol names to make the 
transition and integration easier.

	Ingo